48 million civil and commercial court cases involving companies in US federal, UK and Australian courts, with parties, case types, docket timelines and outcomes.
Data product · Listing updated 11 Nov 2026
United Kingdom
United States
Australia
New filings available within 24 hours
48 million cases, about 30,000 new filings a day
Mid-market, Enterprises
US federal court dockets, UK court lists and judgments, and Australian federal and state court registries
Daily docket monitoring, party-to-company entity resolution and analyst review of outcome coding
Litigation history for companies, for credit, underwriting and due diligence teams who need more than a news search.
US coverage comes from federal district, bankruptcy and appellate court dockets; UK coverage from published court lists and judgments in England and Wales; Australian coverage from federal and state court registries that publish case information. Parapet monitors dockets daily and resolves party names to companies with an entity-matching model and analyst review. Criminal matters are excluded, and names of private individuals who appear as parties are redacted. Damages figures are taken only from public judgments and filings. History begins in 2005 for US federal courts and 2012 for the UK and Australia.
12 fields as documented by Parapet Risk Data.
| Field | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| case_id | string | Parapet case identifier | — |
| court | string | Court name | — |
| jurisdiction | string | US, GB or AU, with state where relevant | — |
| case_number | string | Court's case number | — |
| case_type | string | contract, ip, employment, insolvency and so on | — |
| filed_date | date | Filing date | — |
| status | string | open, closed, stayed or appealed | — |
| company_parties | json | Company parties with roles and entity IDs | — |
| docket_event_count | integer | Number of docket events | — |
| last_event_date | date | Date of the latest docket event | — |
| outcome | string | judgment, settlement, dismissal or pending | — |
| damages_awarded | number | Damages where public, in local currency | — |
Real rows from the provider's sample file. Personal data is masked before anything is shown.
| courtstring | case_numberstring | case_typestring | filed_datestring | company_partiesstring | statusstring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US District Court (demo district) | 1:26-cv-00123 | contract | 2026-09-18 | Example Logistics Inc. v. Demo Freight LLC | open |
| High Court of Justice (example) | BL-2026-000456 | insolvency | 2026-08-02 | Re Sample Retail Ltd | closed |
| Federal Court of Australia (example) | NSD789/2026 | ip | 2026-10-07 | Demo Devices Pty Ltd v. Example Gadgets Pty Ltd | open |
Prices in USD, as published by Parapet Risk Data
all three jurisdictions
per company litigation report via API
Converted amounts use DataStoa display rates and are approximate. Parapet Risk Data quotes the final price, taxes and terms.
Request detailed pricing3 countries across 3 regions.
Time coverage: 2005 to present.
Provider-reported
Latency: New filings available within 24 hours
DataStoa has not audited these figures. Ask the provider how they are measured, or test them on a sample.
The licence is agreed directly between you and Parapet Risk Data. This summary is provider-reported; the linked terms prevail.
Not listed: AI / ML model training, AI retrieval and grounding, redistribution allowed, marketing and outreach, research use. Ask Parapet Risk Data if you need any of these.
Sanctions, PEP, adverse media, litigation and IP data for screening
Parapet Risk Data compiles official sanctions lists, public-role PEP records, adverse media, court records and patent filings into screening-ready datasets and APIs. Compliance and risk teams in more than 40 countries use it for KYB, onboarding and ongoing monitoring.
Also available on: Snowflake Marketplace, Microsoft Azure
What buyers say about Parapet Risk Data. Reviews cover the provider, not only this listing.
from 2 reviews
Patents filed under a dozen subsidiary names roll up to the right parent, which used to be the slowest part of our landscape studies. Trademark coverage is useful but less deep than patents.
Ben R., IP analyst, Technology consultancy
Better transliteration and date-of-birth handling cut our sanctions alert volume noticeably without missing any true matches in our back-testing. List updates land within hours of official publication.
Chloe N., Financial crime manager, Digital bank